Vote No To The BNP

A question that is as things stand an easy one to answer with a simply NO, currently the British National Party don’t have the support of the mass of the voting public that they would need to secure a General Election victory in 2010.

With their average voter support running at between 3 and 5% there really doesn’t seem to any chance that they will suddenly pick up that much support to cause any kind of upset in the 2010 General Election. However that being said they are actually starting to have some minor impacts in particular areas of the country that could see them making gains in terms of gaining MPs in Westminster within a few General Elections.

Looking at the past year’s worth of Elections the BNP claimed two MEPs in the European Parliment based on receiving less votes than they actually polled in the previous European Elections, however they did increase their number of voters by 100,000 over all.

But they then followed those gains with a series of bad results in local Council elections failing to win any more seats and also losing one seat that did actual hold, this together with the three by-elections for Westminster MP seats which they failed to poll enough votes in all three to hold on to their deposit would suggest that there really isn’t such a big surge in support for the British National Party (BNP) across the country.

But they do still remain something of a threat, if the main parties do not start to take them on head on during the 2010 General Election they could in fact be helping them along the road of acceptability, the main parties need to make a serious effort to confront the British National Party (BNP) in each and every seat they contest in the 2010 General Election and show the public that the BNP have nothing to offer our country.

If the main parties fail to do this the BNP won’t make massive gains in the next General Election (I don’t see them gaining any MP’s this time around), but if left un challenged then they will be able to quietly promote their brand of anti-White politics and continue to use tactics of stirring up racial tentions in run down communitites where they achieve their best results, allowing the British National Party to continue to do this silently through their backdoor methods eventually they will gain serious footholds in a few areas of the country.

Michael Howard made similar comments in a newspaper this week and as far as I am concerned it’s about time one senior politician stood up and started identifying the BNP as a problem, not as a political force but as a problem that needs to be addressed and pushed back to the fringes which is where they firmly belong.

The main parties need to be hitting the British National Party (BNP) firmly where it hurts in the policy manifesto, showing the British voting public that the BNP has nothing to offer in terms of real world workable policy is the key to keeping their vote down as well as playing on the facts of who the party has as it’s senior people and advisors, use the names like Lee Barnes, Mark Collette, Arthur Kemp and of course the party Chairman himself Nick Griffin, all of these people have serious issues with past comments they have made and things they have done that will clearly turn many many voters away from the party.

The history of the BNP no matter how many claims they have made to change is the single most powerful tool the main parties have to use against the BNP, the majority of the British voting public are known for being against such ideals and ideas and have very long memories when it comes to people such as these, so use their own words and pasts against them at every opportunity, reminding the voting public of the exact types of people the BNP are, and one other key to this is to constantly remind the voters that the BNP come out of the National Front which has NEVER in it’s history made any serious gains in the political arean, so showing the evidence that the BNP leaders all come from the National Front will also kill a lot of votes for the British National Party.

Then using the BNP policies against them like the Economic Policy where they have NO plans or policies in place to reduce the current deficit, the only economic plans they are are to turn the country in to a protectionist state which as history shows as well as all the sane economic research shows will do nothing but destroy our country from the inside, protectionism will end in disaster for the UK economy and standing on the world stage.

Although the BNP are currently playing on the deaths of British Soldiers in Afghanistan and using pictures of our fallen British soldiers on their website in an attempt to make some political gains in something of a back habded cheap attempt to pull at the heart strings of the British public, I think that this tactic will backfire on them as the British public are NEVER happy with ANY political party using images of our war dead to promote their political ideals even more so when those ideals are born out of hatred of non-Whites which remember is exactly where they came from the National Front and this is an image they will never be able to shake as recently a number of their senior members of the British National Party have left the party to return to their Nationalist roots in the National Front visit Jackson4Leader.com to find out why, but I will give you some of the key points of why here:

1. Sadly we have come to the conclusion that the BNP is breaking up and there is no practicable likelihood of it recovering.

2. In our opinion the root cause of the failure is the Constitution of the Party

3. A further major problem is that of money. Under the Constitution, all money is controlled by the Party Leader. The Party Leader appoints the Party Treasurer and Party Auditor. The Leader has carte blanche to dispose of the funds as he pleases.

The last point there is well worth highlightly as for the last three years the British National Party has continually failed to submit it’s accounts on time to the Electoral Commission which has resulted in continual fines being impossed on the party, and added to this for the last two years the British National Parties own auditors have refused to sign of the BNP accounts as even they believe they are having the true facts of the state of the parties financies and the way they manage their own financies can we realy trust a prty that seems to be more than happy flouting the rules of the Electoral Commission year on year and even after filling late they still don’t look to be giving accurate accounts.

The British National Party (BNP) are currently under instructions from the Electoral Commission to provide a written statement of answers as to why their auditors feel the accounts are not up to standard or do not accuratley reflect the state of the parties financies, they have to do this by January 8th 2010.

Depending on the answers given they could be facing prosecution for illegal accounting and reporting, so we have to ask ourselves the question again can we honestly trust a party that can’t even manage it’s own accounts even after three years worth of fines and warnings from the Electoral Commission they still continue to fail to get it right, can we really trust them to manage the countries economy?

There are so many questions the voting public should press the BNP on and just asking these few questions will uncover the BNP for the miss managed, disorganised shambles it continues to be.

So with all this in mind we go back to our original question which is Can The BNP Win A General Election?, well as I have already said at this stage they have no chance for a few reasons all of those stated above and also the fact that they are not intending to put up enough candidates in the 2010 General Election to gain a majority in parliment, they are only planning on fielding 200 candidates so I would safely say that they won’t even play a part in any potential hung parliment, so even looking at the outised possibility that the BNP manage to get two MPs elected they still won’t hold any power over the country, which going by the way the Nationalist Movement tends to work won’t be enough to appease them and keep the supporters loyal, once they see that their elected MPs (assuming they get any) have no power to effect change in the country then their loyalties will drift back towards the old leanings of Nationalism, aka the likes of the National Front.

And that said we also need to look at how long it has taken the Liberal Democrats to become a serious contender in British politics, but they have taken over 20 years to achieve their current 62 MPs and they don’t have the history that the BNP has to contend with, so the reality is that for the BNP to become any major force in British politics they need at least 20 years and getting rid of the current leadership to really start to give the party any air of repectability in the views of the mainstream voters.

So to all those BNP fanatics that rush around the internet proclaiming the BNP are on course to become a Government I would suggest you take a closer look at the way British politics works and see the reality of the British National Party position in the political make up of the UK, they have too hard a fight to win to gain any kind of serious foothold, and juding by the recent financial questions being raised about the BNP one would have to question whether they could even last long enough financially to go through the next 20 years scrapping at the door of Westminster.

Vote No To The BNP in 2010

©2009 Vote-No-To-BNP

I visit the BNP website on a regular basis and on Christmas Day I had a quick look to be confronted by the British National Party using an image of our dead Britsih Service personnel being used as the main leader of their website.

As an individual that whole heartedly supports ever thing our British Service personnel do for us around the world I can only be sad and disgusted in equal measure that a party that proports to be a “mainstream” “honest” political party blatantly using images of two dead British soldiers in their coffins as they returned home from Afghanistan and showing what I consider to be (as do MANY MANY other people I have spoken to about this) a blatant disregard for their memories with this attempt to use the lifes of our British soldiers home comings for political gain.

I think anyone who really cares about our British Soldiers (people like you) will see straight through this dispicable act of blatant disrespect for both the Soldiers in the coffins and also the families of those soldiers who are having to go through their first Christmas without the Brothers/Sons/Boyfriends/Husband and Fathers this Christmas.

The British National Party proudly shout out bring them home yet then choice to show just how much they don’t care either about those soldiers or their families by using this image on their website (I was going to add the image here but I don’t have that much disrespect to subject those families to even considering doing that).

How can anyone with any sense of decency and thought for what our soldiers are doing for us or for the families of those that have died in service of this country even consider voting for a party like the British National Party who show little if any regard for those soldiers or their families at Christmas?

Ask yourself can you really support a party that has not one second thought about doing this on Christmas day?

Vote No To The BNP in 2010

©2009 Vote-No-To-BNP

As the British National Party (BNP) are making claims that David Cameron (Conservative Party Leader) has “admitted” that the Liberal Democrats (Nick Clegg), Labour Party (Gordon Brown) & the Tories are the same, here is the actual broadcast where he says something very different have a listen for yourself.

He Actually Said “All Parties Have Something In Common We Are All In This To Create A Fairer, Greener and Safer Briton. It’s Just That The Means To Achieve That Where We Differ”

So you’ll not he said “ALL PARTIES” and Not the LibDems and Labour.

So to kick out the story with the real words for you, have a watch and listen for yourself. So we can’t even trust them to quote someones own words even though the video evidence is available on the Conservative Party YouTube.com channel that shows exactly what was said, and proves that the British National Party (BNP) version is in correct.

The reasons the BNP are putting out this story is that they have had a long running Conspiracy Theory they have been trying to put around which goes along the lines of the Labour Party, The Liberal Democrats and the Conservative parties are actually all working together and simply pretending to be different to fool the British public in to which ever party they want to be elected at the time.

Now I hope like me that the majority of the Great British voting public can see that this rather wild conspiracy claim by the British National Party (BNP) is as ridiculous as their many other conspiracy theories, and one way to show you this is as follows, if the British National Party (BNP) really believe that the three main parties are in fact just one party pretending to be three seperate ones then why do they then claim:

The Green Party is funded/set up by the Labour Party as a front organisation?
UKIP is a party funded/set up by the Conservative party as a front organisation?

Surely if the main 3 parties are already just one party as the first conspiracy claims, then why would two of the three then need to set up other parties as front parties for the own seperate party? strange isn’t it? but the reality is this is the message the British National Party are trying to put out and trying to convince you the voting public is the case, yet when you examine these conspiracy theories next to each other you can see the imposibility or at least the unlikely chance that any of these theories are true at all, and they remain in the minds of ONLY the Members/Leaders and Supporters of the British National Party (BNP).

And lets also ass to this mix a few other conspiracies the British National Party (BNP) believe in:

1. Climate change is all made up as part of a World Wide conspiracy theory to creat a New World Order (Global Government)

2. The charity “Common Purpose” established in 1989 is according the what the BNP believe a covert organisation funded by this and previous Governments with the sole intention of undermining and destroying Great Britain from within.

3. All the recent by-elections for both MPs and Council Seats have been lost by the British National Party (BNP) due to the other three parties rigging the vote by manipulating the postal voting system (if you Google these or talk to any BNP supporter they will confirm these to you with great joy)

And these are just a few of the conspiracies the British National Party, can we really trust or vote for a “Political Party” that is so lost in a sea of conspiracy theories to run our country?

Can we really trust them to be in control of the British Economy when they can’t even be trusted to file their own accounts without their own auditors refusing to sign them off as correct?

The BNP are currently being investigated by the Electoral Commission for inadequate accounting in relation to their 2008 accounts which were for the third year running filled late as well as being inadequate, can we really trust these people to be in control of our Economy?

Vote No To The BNP in 2010

©2009 Vote-No-To-BNP

A strange thing to say you may think, but there is a simple reason for me suggesting this course of action anyway as I will go into in this article.

All we need to do is look at the facts as quoted by the British National Party (BNP); they themselves have stated the following:

1. They will NOT win the next General Election

2. They are only putting up around 200 candidates (not enough for a majority)

3. They are only targeting gaining 2 MPs Elected anyway, (so no power in Westminster)

BNP Supporters say the BNP will stop all immigration, but the reality is that they can’t

BNP Supporters say the BNP will bring us out of the European Union, but the reality is they can’t

BNP Supporters say the BNP will help millions of Immigrants to leave, but the reality is they can’t

In fact if ANY BNP Supporter says the BNP can do anything, the reality is they can’t

And why can’t they? Well that’s easy to explain; by the BNP’s own admition they are only putting up around 200 MPs in the next general election which as everyone knows isn’t enough to secure a majority in Westminster.

Even if we said on the VERY outside chance that all those 200 candidates do manage to get elected then 200 MPs still won’t be enough to force any law changes or referendum on the European Union. There would be over 400 MPs in Westminster that would more than likely vote against ANY BNP Proposal, at that even they BNP would have to attract support from over 150 MPs Tory/Lab/Lib’s to get any law change implemented and that is VERY unlikely to happen.

So in effect the BNP is of no threat at all in the next election or in the next Parliment, we can see from history that a party never comes from absolutely nowhere to full power, the BNP currently has no elected MP’s so the chances of them going from zero to 200 is virtually impossible anyway.

The best way to defeat anything the BNP says is therefore to use what they actually say against them, the official BNP Party line is to field just 200 candidates and target gaining 2 MPs which will give them NO power over policy at all, so no matter how much the BNP Supporters protest that the BNP are the only party that can save Britain that is in fact inaccurate as they won’t have enough MPs to be able to effect ANY change what so ever in Parliment.

So the BNP can rant and rave all they like about Conspiracy Theories like the Bilderberg Group and the New World Order, and the Climate Change Hoax because by their own admition they won’t have enough power in Westminster to do anything about anything anyway.

The LibDems have been in Parliment for many years and have only achieved over 60+ MPs and that took them in excess of 20 years to achieve, so going by that history the BNP have the same 20 years if not longer to wait before their vision of the utopia can even start to be considered anyway, as we all know even the LibDems have no real power over policy in British Politics with their limited number of MPs compared to the two main parties Labour and Conservatives.

For the BNP to have any real power in Parliment they in effect need to become the opposition party, which means they need to replace Labour or Conservatives as the second party in the country, and this is going to take MANY MANY years to achieve.

This shows again that the best way to beat the BNP is to not bother and simply use their own parties quotes against them, which are again:

1. They will NOT win the next General Election

2. They are only putting up around 200 candidates (not enough for a majority)

3. They are only targeting gaining 2 MPs Elected anyway, (so no power in Westminster)

There we have it then really, the BNP has no chance of gaining power by their own admition, and also by their own admition they are only trying to get 2 MPs elected, so easy to see they can’t make any change to British Politics anyway.

Vote No To The BNP in 2010

©2009 Vote-No-To-BNP

As we all already know Nick Griffin MEP and British National Party (BNP) Chairman and the rest (or at the minimum 95% if it’s members and supporters) are convinced that the Bilderberg Group are a part of the global power house of groups that make up the plan to create the New World Order, Global Govenance Programme. The programme that has supposedly been working since the 30’s to design and engineer a single world order controlled by Britain and the USA.

(if you need more info on this Conspiracy theory just click on my BNP and the New World Order page)

But for the purpose of this article I am going to make the assumption that I actually believe in the conspiracy to creat this single world or New World Order Government and use the next few minutes of you time to show you how Nick Griffin of the British National Party (BNP) could actually be a part of this Bilderberg Group and therefore could be leading the Nationalists of Europe down the path of conforming with the world wide plot to create the New World Order.

We all know that the New World Order plot needs to Leaders of both countries and specific groups of people including Business, Industry and political groups in order to be able to make the programme work in the real world.

As as we know (from the conspiracy websites) that President Obama and Gordon Brown, and apprently no David Cameron are all members of the Bilderberg Group to make the United Kingdom part of the programme work, so we could also assume that other European Country leaders are also part of the Bilderberg Group in order to make the New World Order acceptable to the wider European Community.

So it would stand to reason that with the rise of far-right parties growing across Europe that the Bilderberg Group (NWO) would be best served if they recruited a far-right politician that they could condition to be part of the programme.

As Nick Griffin has been deeply involved within far-right movements pretty much since he was a child then he would potentially be an ideal candidate to recruit to the group, so since Nick Griffin took over the British National Party (BNP) he has made very public attempts to change the party into a more acceptable party and therefore allow the far-right to have a more acceptable voice to the European far-right and therefore unite the European far-right into one European grouping of far-right parties therefore bringing them closer to the Bilderberg New World Order acceptability.

So we can establish that there would be a reason to want to recruit a far-right leader (with an air or acceptability to the wider public) so we could assume that Nick Griffin is that far-right leader of choice, as he would have more appeal to the seriously far-right groups and parties based on his past history, they would find him easier to believe than lets say the current UKIP Leader Lord Pearson who afterall comes from a Conservative background and wouldn;t be that hard to bring back into the fold.

So we have established a reason to recruit him, and we have established he is gaining that air of respectability to the wider European far-right Nationalist groups, now what we need to do to show more respectability to the potential of Nick Griffin having already been recruited to the Bilderberg Group by way of showing what he has done recently that could if thought about be considered as part of the programme of incorporating a far-right leader and therefore his followers and supporters and the wider European far-right parties.

This can be established in a number of ways which I will outline for you now:

1. Nick Griffin has turned the BNP from the skinhead look into the suit and tie brigade of Nationalism in the UK.

2. Nick Griffin has secured his position inside the British National Party by writing the parties constitution is such a way that he has full executive control over the direction of the party, which has also at the same time made it virtualy impossible to remove him as the leader (was he advised and helped in producing this constitution in order to make sure he remains the figurehead of British/European Nationalism?)

3. Nick Griffin has been the driving force behind the entire change of the parties membership policy now one could assume as Gordon Brown is also part of the Bilderberg Group (according to the theory) so the Government assisted by Gordon Brown set up the whole EHRC case in order to help Nick Griffin push the change on the party, it is possible they were resisting the change so the law was needed to help Nick Griffin give the party the final push and therefore achieving two aims a. Making the BNP completly legal and b. Giving the wider BNP party more appeal to the general public as they would no longer have the racist party tag attached to them.

3. So the above has already been started, now what we need to do is to get Nick Griffin into an elected position, we can’t put him straight into Westminster as it would a. make the Nationalists Sceptical too quickly, and the wider voting public would fall for it, so what do we do? we start him off in the European Parliment.

4. By moving him into the European Parliment we get two parts of the job done, 1. we have raised his profile and acceptability to the UK as a whole and we have now secrured a platform for him to recruit other European Nationalist paries to get them onside (which he has already started by forming part of the new far-right alliance)

5. Once his profile is building from being part of the European Parliment and he has started the work of building a European far-right alliance (which includes his recent trip to Spain to get the Spanish far-right beliving in him), now you can start to see how this would fit with the alledged New World Order master mo so to speak.

6. His position in Europe can also then be used to whilst he is out of the public eye in the UK he can attend meetings with other New World Order members in order to forward the programme, and the perfect place for that would of course be the European Parliment a place where Nick Griffin does spend a lot of time (now you should start to question what exactly is he doing there all the time? he can;t be that involved with the inner workings of the European Parliment that he needs to go so often can he?)

7. Now we need to move Nick Griffin into the wider UK political scene to give him even more respectability in an attempt to bring the hardline groups like his original party the National Front onside, so what do we need to do? Well we need to put him up in a high profile seat against a high profile Government MP (a seat like Barking for instance), and then we need to make sure he wins, so we put pressure on the BBC to make sure he gets air time by means of Party Political Broadcasts on TV, something that has been done.

8. Then we shall we say help the voters along (or just rig the vote why not apprently that’s exactly how Barrack Obama was put into place), ow we have Nick Griffin in place in Westminster this servs two goals one whilst the plans continue to move forward nick Griffin can remain close to the other members of the UK arm of Bilderberg David Cameron, Gordon Brown etc so that they can have their meetings under the gise of Westminster to push ahead with the UK end of the plan.

When the ulitimate goal is achieved and all the different groups are onside and ready to be lead in whichever direction we need them, when the concentration (or Labour Camps) are ready (apparently they are already being built across the US), the leaders of the decenting groups that would fight against the programme (i.e. The European Nationalist) Nick Griffin can be used to lead them into the Labour Camps to build and manufacture whatever the New World Government wants them to do, as long as they are out of the way so that the bigger picture can be achieved and the New World Order can be established with the remaining happy people of the world who are happy to go along with the plan.

So we have our millions of workers (slaves) and we have our other population that is also prepared to work but not rock the boat and let the New World Government take control, these are then rewarded with higher paying jobs and a much better lifestyle whilst the millions of decentors are used to do the crappy jobs.

So you can see from this article that it would be possible assuming that the New World Order conspiracy theory is real that Nick Griffin could have been recruited in order to remove the Nationalists from the scene and therefore help to clear the path for the programme.

So for the BNP supporters and members maybe you should start to question just who you have signed you alligance to, maybe he is just another part of the conspiracy to control the planet, look at what he has been doing recently that would fit in with the standard method of operations within the New World Order leadership, if you do the research on the whole theory you’ll see this is the method they use to get the people in the right positions to carry out their alloted tasks.

So is Nick Griffin really the leader to give you back your Britain or is he really just another part of the New World Order operation put in place to bring you all into line and follow like sheep blindly believing everything Nick Griffin says to you?

Is he really the leader you think he is? can you really trust him? or is he simply in it for the greater rewards that he will get down the road once the New World Order is in place?

These are the questions you now need to be asking, if you really do believe in the New World Order plot then you need to question everyone around you, Nick Griffin has become the man you trust, the man you believe has it all worked out and the man that will lead you to freedom BUT will he really be leading you to freedom? or is he leading you to the Labour Camps and helping the New World Order remove a problem?

Can you take that risk? should you now be thinking of leaving the party and comming back to the normal fold and be prepared to accept the New World Order and therefore claim you reward of hiher wages and a better life? or should you get Nick Griffin replaced at all cost and get someone else in that can really lead you to the freedom you want?

It’s up to you, if you believe the New World Order is coming then decide quickly before it’s too late, if you don’t believe it’s coming then you’re fine to plod along as normal.

Anyway I hope you’ve enjoyed this different look at the New World Order idea and just how Nick Griffin could and maybe is fitting right into it.

Personally I think the whole idea of the New World Order is bollox, but as a non believer I don’t have to be that worried about being sold down the river by my leader.

Vote No To The BNP in 2010

©2009 Vote-No-To-BNP