Vote No To The BNP

Well after my day of door knocking yesterday I didn’t get around to checking emails, but I was suprised today when I checked my emails to see an email from a BNP Supporter (who didn’t reveal his identity) in which he makes a claim to have set up a £1 Billion company to promotes the BNP.

I thought some of my readers would like to read what this rather deluded British National Party (BNP) supporter wrote in his email, if you can contain your lolz long enough to get to the end of the email that is.

Now I love a good laugh but one has to question the mental stability of this person who’ll you’ll notice doesn’t even feel proud enough of his wild claims to put his real name to the email, well after you’ve read it i’m sure his reason will become so obvious to you, and that’s simply he hasn’t put his name to it because he doesn’t actually exist.

He seems to be so deluded that he has created himself this billionaire image to cover up for facing the reality of his own sad existance, we do have to take pity on the poor deluded members of the BNP.

Just in case anyone wonders if this email is true, I have of course kept a copy with all the original headers intact so that it’s existance can be verified. Just for fun I have also sent a copy of it to the Electoral Commission who may be interested in some of the daft claims this person makes as it would be openly breaking the laws surrounding funding of political parties.

Anyway have fun reading this mad email.

Dear All

Let me just make one thing very clear to avoid any misunderstandings. You lot are a complete bunch of ignorant prats. Because of your youth you cannot possibly have any understanding of how mass immigration has divided communities of those of the over-25 age group.

When I was at university everyone mixed in together and my views were exactly the same as yours, but as I have gotten older I have seen those “ethnic friends” turn away and form their own groups. You lot cannot possibly know that yet because you are too young and you are still at the “everyone happily mixing together stage of your lives.”

I am writing this email to say that your stance against the BNP is so ill-conceived and misguided, because the BNP are a necessary part of the political process and they need to be a bigger part of that process.

Let me just make these few points about myself:
I am an award-winning economist and strategist
My financial strategies allowed me to earn in excess of £200 million four years out of the last five
It’s highly likely I know a lot more about most things than all of you

Let me make these few points about the BNP:
Their immigration policies are a much needed thing for this country’s social survival
Their nationalist ideas are necessary for our economic survival
The stories that you put on your website about the BNP are misleading to say the least and you are just playing at journalism

Just consider something outside of your youthful and hopefully idyllic existence for one minute. Just consider those communities where mass immigration has destroyed and divided the local population and the depair and despondency felt by those people. Also consider those workers that travel to work everyday depressed at the state of this country and how it is being run that don’t have the release of being under 25 and having a ton of friends that they can go out partying with. Just consider for one moment those honest, decent and hardworking people that campaign or work for or support the BNP. The thing is when you’re young you don’t actually give a fuck, you couldn’t care less about those 1 million people that voted for the BNP because they see radical change as what is needed. The truth is you just don’t have a clue about life yet. You’re still wet behind the ears. Guys don’t even begin to have any clue about what they want from life until they are over 30, they just drift into things without even thinking of the consequences.

Anyway I digress. Let me just make a few final points:

Take a walk around some local communities blighted by mass immigration, such as Luton and Tottenham or Wembley and see how alienated you feel, and imagine yourself living there (not as a student or housesharer) but as someone married raising their family there
Think how overpopulated our country is right now from Labour’s mass immigration policy. But, with in excess of 1 million immigrants still coming here every year and the large families they have once here, how that would impact in just the space of 1 parliament. That’s an extra 4 million plus more than we have now in just the space of a parliament
We must start to reverse this trend, not just slow it down. Do you honestly want your future children going to a school where they are a minority in their own country. Do the math, I have, whites will be a minority here by 2060.

Listen, I hate to bang the white drum. I want immigration here in the UK, it enriches our culture in a good way, but mass immigration is the bad thing, not immigration. Too fast a flow of immigrantion does not give communities time to adjust.

The BNP has some extreme elements too it, but it is shedding that on a daily basis. However, believe me when I say radical policies are needed for this country. I would urge you all to back the BNP, or at least to start a dialogue with them, because you are seriously misguided and blinkered in your current approach.

I just recently donated over £1 billion pounds to set up a company to drive forward the BNP into the mainstream of politics and to assist the party to build towards the future. I can buy every trade union member in this country if I wanted to, I could buy enough votes by selling an idea to people, but I don’t want to do that. I want people to genuinely see for themselves how the BNP is the only party that can rebuild our broken society and that while they may still have a lot of flaws, that they have the ideas and that they deserve the opportunity to showcase themselves. My money will see that happens and that people have the opportunity to decide for themselves.

could just blacklist you all, so that you would never find mainstream work anywhere with any major company in the UK, but I don’t want to do that either. I want you to drop this pathetic direction of yours and engage with the BNP. Write to them and offer to be open-minded and not blind and one-sided. You are the bigots, not them. They are fighting a worthy cause and you are just clueless misdirected ididots.

Be part of the solution, not part of the problem. It’s not racist to open a debate with the BNP and actually listen for once in your lives to another side, apart from your own.

Regards
A very wealthy person that will make sure the BNP become one of the 3 main parties

This mega loaded BNP Supporter using of course a free Hotmail account using the name Hollywood Hogan, which is of course exactly what you’d expect a rather rich billionaire to do, have a free email account using such an original name like Hollywood Hogan, which I guess is a reference to Hulk Hogan the American Wrestler which of course makes his email even more valid doesn’t it ?.

Well I hope you had just a big a laughing session as I did when I first read the email this morning, but it does go to show the mentality of the average BNP supporter in that they believe that by making up some delusional life for themselves they will suddenly be taken more seriously, or expect people like me to suddenly say the BNP are great and want to rush off and join.

So Hollywood Hogan I guess you have worked out what my response would be? incase you haven’t then obviously I don’t believe a single word of your pathetic claim, and obviously i’m not going to be suddenly stopping writing this blog and running off to the saviour of the BNP.

Vote No To The BNP in 2010

©2010 Vote-No-To-BNP

As if we all didn’t already know that the British National Party (BNP) Members/Supporters were something of a desperate group of people trying to get votes by any means, one particular member/supporter has decided that copying my Twitter account and using it to spout anti-UAF propaganda is something of a desperate new low.

As many people who read my blog all ready know whilst I do agree with the message of the UAF I don’t always agree with their method of delivery (and I am not a member of the UAF), but this particular BNP member/supporter has obvioulsy taken a dislike to me because I stick to posting anti-BNP material both on the blog and Twitter he/she obvioulsy feels that creating the fake Twitter account will in some way help the BNP win extra votes or a least discredit me in some way.

Here are a selection of the Tweets the BNP Supporter is Tweeting to my followers, i’m sure you’ll agree that this is serious desperation on the individuals part and only shows up the BNP and actually doesn’t help them in anyway at all.

You can see from this entry that this BNP Supporter is in fact causing a criminal offence which is that of defermation of charector, which has been reported to Twitter.

And in these two we see the BNP Supporter just running into a childish insult towards two of my other followers.In this Tweet we see the fake BNP Supporters Twitter account launch into a racist post toward a Pakistani member of the community, and the BNP try to claim they are not racist, do you really need any further proof that they are?

This Tweet is aimed at a follower of mine who on his own profile describes himself as just 16, so now we see the BNP Supporter making accusations that I am in some way attempting to attract young people, this is clearly bordering on illegal but again I think you’ll all agree that the actions taken by this BNP supporter are mindless and childish and serve no other purpose other than to discredit the BNP themselves.

**UDPDATE** 2nd March 2010

So we can see our not so clever BNP Supporter has kept his game of blatant insults to anyone and everyone, we have to wonder just what kind of mental disorder this guy has to attack random people via Twitter.

Now our little mental nutter moves on to accusing another Twitter user of being a Child Sex Offender, if these are the tactics the British National Party (BNP) are instructing their supporters to use to win votes for the 2010 General Election I don’t see them having much chance of winning any MPs.
.Well I think this one really speaks for the level of intelligence this BNP supporters has, what more evidence do you need that the BNP are a total waste of a vote in 2010 when this is the level their supporters are prepared to go to?

We’ve all been hearing the hype whipped up by the BNP since the European Elections in 2009, this can be seen as the point where many people had actually heard of the BNP for the first time or at the least like me have taken any real notice of the British National Party, as up until that point I had simply ignored them in terms of an irrelevant party in British politics, but after getting their 2 MEPs elected in 2009 they started to appear more in the media and people who normally just ignored them started to take a closer look.

Since the EU Elections we receive a constant barrage of attempts by the BNP to show some form of wide spread support around the country for their politics, which in many cases was pushed forward by the media making more of the BNP than they frankly deserve in the grand scheme of politics the BNP remains a minor party who don’t command the vote of a high number of British voters.

Looking at the BNP vote share from the European Elections in 2009 we can easily see that they still remain a minor party claiming just 6.2% of the national vote share achieving just over 943,000 votes across the UK, in real terms this is nothing special when we consider that the Green party who only had two MEPs elected did so on just over 1.3 million votes nearly 400,000 more than the BNP.

In terms of the right-wing vote competition between the BNP and UKIP then we see that the BNP were frankly hammered in real terms UKIP have 13 MEPs elected which in the reality of politics make them a far more powerful party than the BNP representing Britain in the European Parliment, so all the hype portrayed by the BNP and allowed to sound real by the mass media in the UK actually doesn’t exist.

Two MEPs and 50 councillors doesn’t a powerful party make in British Politics, when we consider all the extra media attention poured onto the BNP since the EU Elections the public have the impression that the BNP is a far more powerful party attracting a far bigger share of the vote than they are really are gaining.

But thankfully the British voting public are not taking all the hype to heart and are seeing that the BNP are in fact still a minor party and are not gaining the vote share that certain elements are maintaining they are.

So far in 2010 the British National Party (BNP) have taken part in 8 council elections around the country some of which have been in what the BNP would call their core target voter the white working class vote, but when we take a closer look at the actual results we can clearly see that the BNP are not making any major in roads in local politics around Britain.

The reality is that the BNP haven’t gained any new seats since their 2 MEPs in the 2009 EU Elections the fact is they have actually lost two of their councils seats one in a by-election and one when a high profile BNP Councillor Alby Walker left the BNP and decided to stand against the BNP in the 2010 General Election in the Stoke Central seat.

Lets look at the 8 council by-elections the BNP have stood in so far in 2010 and see just how low their vote has been in real terms.

South Tyneside, Primrose = 566 (vote share dropped from 2008)
Birstall Watermead = 288 (1st attempt)
Liverpool, Fazakerley = 234 (vote share dropped from 2008)
Telford & Wrekin, The Nedge = 103 (1st attempt)
Hucknall Central, Ashfield DC = 131 (1st attempt)
Chichester, Plaistow = 89 (1st attempt)
London Colney Parish Council North West ward = 61 (1st attempt)
Wakefield = 353 (vote share dropped from 2008)

What we can clearly see from these recent results is that the BNP don’t command the vote share they claim to have gaining just 1,825 votes from 8 elections really isn’t something to write home about.

Looking at these results one would have to question where exactly is this mass support the BNP like to claim they have ? because it certainly doesn’t seem to be showing in the real poll results, what these results do show is that the BNP have a falling level of support with their previous vote share being eroded in 3 of these elections Wakefield, Fazakerley and Primrose have all lowered the vote for the BNP since 2008 with both Wakefield and Fazakerley showing an almost 50% decrease in the BNP vote since the previous election in 2008.

The BNP supporters & maybe the BNP themselves are believing their own hype but the voting public are not and they are continuing to reject the BNP at ever turn, it is widely accepted that the BNP tend to do well in elections with a low turnout and this is actually how they won many of their existing council seats on a low voter turn out.

But it now certainly seems that that initial rush of BNP council seat victories were a majority of people using their vote as a protest vote against the Government the BNP will of course always maintain their hardcore vote but from the results so far this year it is certainly becoming more and more apprent that the BNP are not growing at the rate even the media tried to predict.

The British voting public seem to have been taking notice of the anti-BNP campaign that has been growing ever stronger in the last 12 months and seems to be having an impact in the core BNP areas and voters are rejecting the BNP brand of hate politics right across the country.

As we move towards the 2010 General Election we see the British voting public taking more of an interest in the actual politics of the parties and are examining the policies rather than just putting their protest cross in the box, and now that’s happening it is showing the BNP that people don’t actually support their policies as they have enjoyed the comfort of remaining virtually unchallenged in terms of people attacking their policies in any great way since the EU Elections.

The best conclusion I can draw from this is that the British people are doing what British people do and that is to clearly reject racist politics designed to stir up hate and violence that the BNP like to put out.

Vote NO To The BNP in 2010

©2010 Vote-No-To-BNP

Todays South Tyneside Primrose Ward By-Election result:

Ken Stephenson – Labour 854
Pete Hodgkinson – British National Party 566
Aaron Luke – Independent 213
David Alan Rice – Independent 174
Anthony James Lanaghan – Conservative 124
Susan Heather Troupe – Liberal Democrat 100

Another great result, the BNP share of the vote has been cut back again from 681 in 2008 to 566 in 2010, still second position but facing some serious competition now from other candidates, Aaron Luke first time standing as an independent took 213 votes which is an excellent result.

This is now the 8th Council By-Election held in 2010 in which the BNP have stood where they have been kept out of winning another seat.

This result keeps the run of bad news for the BNP who maintain their record of NOT winning any further council seats since the EU Elections in 2009, it seems the surge in power the BNP like to claim have drifted somewhat and they can’t seem to make any further headway in local politics keeping their number of elected local councillors to around 50 out of over 20,000.

This result again goes to show the BNP are NOT the political power house they like to claim they are, well done to the voters of Tyneside, Primrose for keeping the BNP out in 2010.

The result tonight also bodes well for independents planning to stand in the General Election it seems that people who are somewhat put off the main parties have moved across to the independents which in my opinion isn’t such a bad thing.

This result means the British National Party (BNP) have now taken just 1,825 votes out of the eight council elections they have stood candidates in so far in 2010, not the major political force the BNP seems to think it is really.

Vote NO To The BNP in 2010

©2010 Vote-No-To-BNP

The British National Party (BNP) leader, Nick Griffin, presents himself as a modern, respectable politician but he is nothing of the sort. For over 30 years he has been a hardline fascist. He denies the Holocaust happened, believes that Jews are conspiring against white British people and even today cavorts with some of the world’s most hardline Nazis.

Born in 1959 Nick Griffin comes from a wealthy right-wing family. His father, Edgar was a Conservative party member, involved in Iain Duncan Smith’s campaign for election as party leader until he was discovered answering a BNP hotline in the absence of Griffin’s mother who had also stood as a BNP candidate against Duncan Smith in during the 2001 general election.

Influenced by British Union of Fascists literature on the “Jewish Question” Griffin attended his first National Front aged 15, though did not officially join the party until he was a student at Downing College, Cambridge, where he studied law gaining a lower second-class degree. He rose quickly through the ranks, becoming the national student organiser in 1978.

In 1980, Griffin launched Nationalism Today, a font of “Third Positionist” fascism, which claimed to transcend the evils of both capitalism and communism. Both ideologies, Griffin claimed, were identical as both concentrated private ownership in very few hands, infringing on the right of independence of nation states and, most fundamentally, being Zionist (that is, Jewish) controlled.

Strange bedfellows

During this period Griffin became influenced by Italian fascist Roberto Fiore, a member of the Italian Third Position who introduced Griffin to the blood and soil philosophy of Italian nazi theorist Julius Evola. Under Griffin the NF embraced Third Position politics. Becoming known as “political soldiers” NF representatives met with Colonel Gaddafi’s regime through the Libyan People’s Bureau in London, and expressed support for Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini. Griffin and other leading NF figures then took an all-expenses-paid fundraising trip to Libya as guests of the Gaddafi regime.

Expressing his support for Muslim fundamentalism (which the BNP now paradoxically deplores) Griffin wrote in National Front News that “common interest must be turned into practical cooperation” and that he and his colleagues were not afraid “to be seen standing side by side with Third Way nations such as Libya and Iran.” Griffin also backed black separatist Louis Farrakhan who likewise called for racial apartheid.

In 1989 Griffin left the NF to form the International Third Position, a small reactionary fascist sect, which campaigned against Coca Cola, McDonald’s, urbanisation and “Zionism” (the Jews). Griffin’s involvement was not to last.

In 1990 he lost an eye in an accident. In 1991, after a failed business venture, which cost another member several thousand pounds, Griffin went his own way.

Political chameleon

In 1995, Griffin joined the BNP. His personal journal The Rune, an antisemitic quarterly produced by Croydon BNP served as a platform for opposing the “modernisation” of the BNP, accusing those who wanted change of “rainbow Conservatism”. He also announced that the BNP should prioritise denying the Holocaust to schoolchildren.

Griffin became editor of Spearhead, the flagship BNP journal in 1996 and set out to take over the party, initially seeking a merger with the National Front. In the process Griffin jettisoned many of his core beliefs – at least publicly. Recognising that the BNP was unelectable with some of its policies, Griffin dropped its commitment to compulsory repatriation – though the small print allows for the option to be considered if not enough people accept their financial offer to return home.

In 1998 Griffin was found guilty of distributing material likely to incite racial hatred and was given a two year suspended sentence.

In 1999 he ousted BNP founder John Tyndall to become BNP chairman. In a bid to emulate the success of groups like the French National Front, with which the BNP has close links, Griffin has deliberately toned down the hardline rhetoric of the “old” BNP in exchange for limited electoral success.

Puzzled by Griffin’s apparent conversion to the ballot box his former ITP comrades asked pointedly: “He has been a conservative, a revolutionary nationalist, a radical national Socialist, a Third Positionist, a friend of the ‘boot boys’ and the skinhead scene, a man committed to respectable politics and electioneering, a ‘moderniser’. Which is he in reality?”

Replying to criticism within the far right, Griffin told a private meeting of American nazis and racists that while the BNP needed to change to get elected, his core beliefs – that of the superiority of the white race – remained his driving force.

Out of the glare of the British media Griffin maintains close links with white supremacists and racial scientists who promote spurious racial science. Griffin denied being a racist but is only too happy to consort with leading American extremists including former KKK leaders David Duke and Don Black through forums such as American Renaissance, which seeks to promote the “clear conception of the United States as a nation ruled by and for whites”.

Griffin speaks of the need for community-based politics to build respectability for the BNP in the eyes of voters. Yet this is the same Nick Griffin who only a few years before wrote in The Rune that the only “well-directed boots and fists” could back up BNP policies “not of rational debate.”

Griffin stood in Oldham in the hope of exploiting race riots during the 2001 general election. He gained 16%. During the 2005 general election Griffin stood in Keighley, West Yorkshire, again trying to exploit racial tensions. He polled 4,240 votes (9.16%).

In 2006 he was charged again with inciting racial hatred after calling Islam “a wicked, vicious faith” and that Muslims were guilty of turning Britain into “a multi-racial hell hole.” He was acquitted of all charges, subsequently basking in unheralded publicity, which helped raise the profile of the BNP ahead of the May 2006 local elections.

Griffin is a typical fascist – a man for all people. He is also an outrageous opportunist. There is not a bandwagon or campaign he would not exploit or a political belief he would not jettison if he thought he could benefit.

Griffin the Holocaust denier

Despite Griffin’s new moderate image, he remains a Holocaust Denier. He has attacked Holocaust denier David Irving for being too moderate (!) for admitting that some Jews did indeed die during the Holocaust claiming the “True Revisionists will not be fooled by this new twist to the sorry tale of the Hoax of the Twentieth Century.” His views on the Holocaust led in 1998 to a conviction for distributing material likely to incite racial hatred. He received a two-year suspended jail sentence.

Griffin remains an ardent Holocaust denier. Even today, he still refuses to accept the Holocaust happened. In 2006 he was quoted in the Mail on Sunday as saying: “It’s well known that the chimneys from the gas chambers at Auschwitz are fake, built after the war ended.”

On his farm in Wales Griffin has, according to Wales on Sunday, two pigs one called “Anne” and another called “Frank” – a crude anti-Semitic parody of Anne Frank, the young Jewish girl whose wartime diary, written whilst she was in hiding in Amsterdam is a world famous indictment of Nazi persecution of the Jews. Anne Frank was later betrayed and died in a concentration camp. Apparently Griffin thinks this is funny.

Griffin admitted to the Mail on Sunday that the legacy of Hitler gave British Nationalism a bad name, but in the same interview he traces the roots of the BNP back to the 1930s – to the British Union of Fascists who were praised in Griffin’s own magazine The Rune during the 1990s.

Griffin the anti-Semite

In 1997 Nick Griffin produced Who are the Mindbenders? Adapted from a US Nazi publication of the same name, it claims to prove that the minds of British people are brainwashed through Jewish control of the media. The booklet includes a list of all known Jews working in the media as though they are working together for a joint cause. He proves Jewish control of the BBC by naming a mere 19 Jews who work for the corporation. He has never repudiated this work.

Griffin in quotes

On the Holocaust

I am well aware that the orthodox opinion is that 6 million Jews were gassed and cremated or turned into lampshades. Orthodox opinion also once held that the earth is flat… I have reached the conclusion that the ‘extermination’ tale is a mixture of Allied wartime propaganda, extremely profitable lie, and latter-day witch-hysteria.”

On Race

Without the White race, nothing matters. [Other right-wing parties] believe that the answer to the race question is integration and a futile attempt to create ‘Black Britons’, while we affirm that non-Whites have no place here at all and will not rest until every last one has left our land.”

On power

When the crunch comes, power is the product of force and will, not of rational debate. We have to have a body of trained young men capable of defending our organisation. If people come to crack our heads we will break theirs.”

On Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf

The chapter I most enjoyed was the one on propaganda and organisation – there were some really useful ideas there.”

On Homosexuality

The TV footage of dozens of gay demonstrators flaunting their perversions in front of the world’s journalists showed just why so many ordinary people find these creatures so repulsive.”

On Haiti

While the Haiti earthquake is terrible, the winter death toll in Britain will be similar. No aid here though.

Sending aid to rioting ingrates while our own people die is stinking elite hypocrisy

Is this really the type of person we should be considering a vote for? is this really what the British people want in a Prime Minister?

Vote No To The BNP in 2010

©2010 Vote-No-To-BNP