Watching the Campaign Show on BBC News this evening the British National Party (BNP) Leader Nick Griffin showed two things, a. that a BNP Government would open the door to all forms of discrimination and b. he doesn’t have a clue really about how British Society works.
Under A BNP Government anyone and everyone could choose to discriminate in absolutely anyway they like, so here are a few ways your employer, your pub landlord or anyone could discriminate:
1. An employer could sack you because you are: Black, White, Asian, Gay, Female, Male etc etc.
2. A pub landlord who doesn’t like Blacks, Asians, Australians etc could just ban all of them
3. An employer could choose not to employ anyone they like, just because
4. If you are disabled forget having access to services, because under the BNP any business could discriminate against disabled people and NOT offer disabled access, parking etc, just because they feel like it.
The list would be endless as according to the BNP leader the BNP would get rid of all discrimination laws, so now let me show you just how Nick Griffin doesn’t have a clue about his own party policy.
The BNP repatriation policy isn’t open to all people, it is available to non-whites, so therefore the BNP are discriminating against white people, yet they claim there would be no discrimination in Britain under the BNP, so I think the BNP Leader has displayed yet another big fail this evening.
He also said that Australians could continue to come to the country for “extended holidays” and take jobs whilst they are here, so the BNP actually doesn’t have a closed Britain policy on immigration, because Australians are white they are ok. But if a black person came on a backpacking holiday I have no doubt they wouldn’t have the same ability to come for a holiday.
If we look at the overstay figures from the ONS it is Australians who come on extended holidays that overstay their visas more than any other group of “holiday makers”. Nick Griffin once again made it 100% clear that the BNP immigration policy is clearly targeted at non-white people, and that should people vote BNP on May 6th they are clearly voting for a country that will allow anyone and everyone to openly discriminate knowing there is nothing that can stop them.
So under the BNP would I then be able to refuse to have a black postman deliver my post? (not that I would) but surely this ability to discriminate extends to who I want knocking my door? so the Post office would have to then send a white postman to deliver my mail, thus costing more money, if enough people decided to do that the cost of postage would go up to cover all that extra cost.
This is also a nice opener to segregation, how long would it be before we saw whites only pubs etc. Electing the BNP would clearly send our country back 100 years, if you want to risk your vote based on Nick Griffins own words then frankly you need to take a serious look at yourself.
Then we can look at the BNP policy on housing, they claim that they will change the system so that people who have lived in an area longer, have family connections, are white will be at the top of the housing list, yet from what Nick Griffin said tonight he would be making illegal policy undre his own Government rules of having NO discrimination policies what so ever.
See just how Nick Griffin really doesn’t have a clue, he seemed to be clearly making up policy on the hoof, without understanding the impact those new policies would have on his own party policies as detailed in the BNP manifesto.
The only thing Nick Griffin proved this evening is that the BNP don’t have the first clue on how to run a country, he doesn’t even understand his own party policy. But the single biggest thing Nick Griffin proved tonight is that the no platform angle taken by many people is the wrong way to go.
He wasn’t even put under any serious pressure on the Campaign Show yet he broke and proved he didn’t understand his own policy, made up new policy on the hoof and by doing so blew his own party policy right out of the water.
Vote No To The BNP in 2010
©2010 Vote-No-To-BNP








