Vote No To The BNP

Guest Post From: Not My Voice

British National Party (BNP) Contradiction and Race Wars

The first point of the BNP Defence policy states that The British Army Must be Used to Defend Britain, setting out its policy and strategic vision. However, the article goes on to completely contradict itself and shows very clearly that British forces are to be used for a racial war and perhaps only racist based war.

The BNP declare that;

Britain must be prepared to launch limited operations where it is necessary to protect our citizens abroad

However, not just British citizens, but actually BNP approved whites.

More recently there were clear grounds to rescue people of British descent from the murderous regime in Zimbabwe.

So a Griffin government would use the forces to help people of British Decent in Zimbabwe, i.e. whites not blacks, Asians etc and NOT actual British citizens at all.

The BNP do not explain how they would do this. Zimbabwe is a landlocked country; the closest points of entry are through Mozambique and South Africa. Both those countries would not tolerate a racist force (whose only aim is to protect whites) from operating on their soil and the South African forces would be a considerable match for any British Expeditionary force.

Mozambique has a limited conventional army and it is but a short hop from the port of Biera to Mutare in the Eastern Highlands of Zimbabwe (a terrain more like the green Scottish Highlands). This would quite clearly involve war with Mozambique and the other SADC members will see this as a blatant re colonisation of Zimbabwe, a Rhodesia Pt II. Should the army get to the Zimbabwean boarder, the poor transport infrastructure and Zimbabwean forces would not allow a white mass to unite with invading forces. Therefore the only way to rescue the whites in Zimbabwe would be for total control of the county.

Zimbabwe has NO “strategic or commercial interests to defend nor were British citizens threatened”. But these are the exact reasons why the BNP claimed to have opposed the war in Afghanistan and Iraq. The BNP clearly set out;

The purpose of Britain’s armed forces is to protect British interests at home and abroad – and nothing else. During the recent Iraq War, which the BNP opposed, there were no strategic or commercial interests to defend nor were British citizens threatened.

And in Zimbabwe…? None of those apply either. The only reason for invading Zimbabwe and its neighbours would because of race.

Rejecting Collective Security

The BNP appear to be against our forces training working and fighting alongside her Allies, contrary to some 2,500 years of military philosophy and experience from such masters of military strategy like Sun Tzu to Clausewitz etc. As part of Rejecting Collective Security they are against having a continued presence in Germany and very clearly this utter Rejection of “Collective Security” refers to NATO.

NATO is an organisation whose roots were laid down by Churchill, with the Atlantic Charter, an agreement between the US and Britain who stood against Germany in Europe although with assistance from the Free French and other uprooted allies free Polish Forces, Belgians, Dutch and ALL nations of the Commonwealth – i.e. Collective security.

The Atlantic Charter brought closeness between Britain, France and the US. After the defeat of Germany the unity of forces was still essential to the democratic forces of Western Europe and Northern America, and the formation of NATO.

Today, NATO is very much needed. Although the Cold War is over, NATO has expanded further east into the former Soviet Bloc (Warsaw Pact) countries. This provides mutual protection for all because democracies do not fight each other.

However, geopolitics always comes into play, regardless of the political ideology of some of the key players. Russia, is coming back into its own as its economy is rebuilding from the Soviet era, through the cleptocracy of the last 20 year. It has restarted its policy of sending bombers on recognisance mission into British airspace to test our capabilities and more frightening than most people recall, Russia appeared quite prepared to go to war with NATO over the conflict over Georgia and Ossetia.

We also face a very real prospect of Nationalist and ultra nationalists having an actual and dominant influence on Russian Politics. It is not un-imaginable that we could have a nationalist Russian government in the next 10-15 years.

To understand the importance of this, and why Britain needs to remain in NATO we should only consider the political difference in Europe between 1933 and 1939.

A failure to understand geopolitics and Russian is perhaps the reason why the BNP declare that;

We shall recall our troops from Germany, where we see little purpose in their continuing presence. The Cold War has long since passed and our troop presence in Germany is superfluous and little more than an insult to the Germans.

Should there be a war between Russian and NATO Countries (excluding a full nuclear exchange) the most likely place for combat is central Europe. British forces being familiar with these areas and training in such terrain remain crucial to the strength and competency of British forces and the Germans appear to be welcoming to the British.

Spurious Claims of Degradation

The BNP set out that twice during the 20th century, the “UK came close to the brink of destruction because of the neglect of our defences”.

Wrong. They have not given any example, but it is fair to presume that one of those examples would be early WW2.

The British defences were not neglected, during the interwar period Liddell Hart continued with huge and expensive experiments in what was later called Blitzkrieg (when German Heinz Guderian put into practise what had been developed by the British armour on the plains of Salisbury). Britain developed Radar, mono-winged aircraft, advanced interceptors, developed strategic bombers and kept a modern naval fleet all in the face of no real peer of military threat in the World. There is no sign the armed forces were neglected at all. Scaled down and modernised in the face of no peer threat? Yes. But neglected? no

The BNP also appear to think that the ‘armed forces’ consists of just the land forces (infantry, armour etc) and this would help explain why The UK did not come close to destruction. The Royal Navy had such a heavy and total presence that the British Isles have not EVER had any realistic prospect of amphibious invasion, not since at least the Spanish Armada. Although Germany had dominant land forces up to about 1943 it didn’t have a surface fleet (not a single aircraft carrier, nor full battleship, only their ‘pocket battleships’).

Further, they did not have invasion barges to carry their army across the Channel. The best it could do was to ‘borrow’ private industry barges from the Rhine (halting their own transport, temporarily crippling their own industry in the Ruhr-Rhine Region) and have them stacked together to give the impression of a pending fleet.

The RAF soon quickly destroyed most of them in their ports. The RAF also had total dominance of airspace over the British Isles. German Blitzkrieg relied on tactical airpower (don’t forget the main weapon of German PZ III wasn’t their 57mm cannon, but the supporting dive bombers and artillery). The Germans would not have been able to use their tactical airpower to support their ground forces, in the face of strong RAF airpower, and so their Blitzkrieg would have been halted quickly out of fuel or ammunition as the Royal Navy prevented any re supply.

The above shows that the BNP have no strategic vision nor understanding of how crucial combined service branches (air force, navy and army) are to the outcome of warfare. There was therefore NO ‘Brink’ that the UK was brought to, due to any claimed neglect of ‘armed forces’.

Using historical analysis the BNP cannot claim there is any current “degradation” nor is there any example of this, they have not provided any details. The UK has been fighting a war on two fronts, and the way British Mechanised forces sliced through Iraq 1,000’s of miles away from home shows the UK armed forces as clearly competent. On the battlefield the UK forces dominate, in the harshest of terrains and environment. The biggest threats are from booby traps and IED’s

However, the British forces are not suited for nation building, and the BNP could not give any example of how they would pacify non state terrorist threats, bearing in mind the Clinton era appeasement failed. Even if the BNP do give an increase defence spending 1% above inflation for every year (this year they would by 4.5%) they cannot show how to stop global terrorism. 911 killed British people too, and other cells have targeted British people abroad.

Despite their claimed pledges, the BNP policy is almost child like – to pull the blanket over your head, to hide from the real world and imagine there are no monsters under the bed .

A clear indicator that the BNP operate a hide-under-their blanket policy, is that the BNP do not believe the Taliban actually operate outside of Afghanistan. Just to show you how clueless the BNP strategy is here is Andrew Brons, debating on the Taliban;

“The Taliban….is killing British soldiers…… However, it is not extending its battles beyond Afghan borders. We could stop it from killing British and allied soldiers tomorrow by removing our troops.

The Taliban is not battling beyond Afghanistan? WRONG. The Taliban have considerably infiltrated Pakistan and taken ground there (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8312932.stm ). It is of the utmost importance that Pakistan does not fall to the Taliban. This would result in a Taliban armed with Nuclear weapons with a competent missile delivery system.

However, rather than committing against the Taliban Brons also appeared to be discussing lightening sanctions against the Taliban. This ignorance and unjustifiable appeasement of the Taliban, one of the most abhorrent and dangerous organisations shows how incompetent any BNP Defence policy is and will make the world a more dangerous place.

However, the Battle for Afghanistan could be discussed for decades but the BNP do appear to have lied when they declare “During the recent Iraq War, which the BNP opposed”. Despite many requests there does not appear to be a single example of BNP opposition. Contrary to this, there are many examples of BNP members protesting against the stop the war coalition. We await strict proof that the BNP did actually oppose the War.

In fact, we await strict proof that the BNP have a credible Defence policy.

Vote No To The BNP in 2010

©2010 Vote-No-To-BNP

Ok something of a nerdy article this one, but I kinda thought it would be interesting to run a quick Key Word scan of the British National Party (BNP) 2010 General Election Manifesto, a document they claim is like nothing they have ever produced before.

A document which is meant to show the British Voting Public just what the BNP could do to save Britain and make it better for the future.

So here we go, in order of the number of times the word(s) appear in the BNP Manifesto:

Culture 134

Immigration 90

Muslim(s) 69

Foreign 68

Islam/Islamic/Islamification or Islamist 52

Now lets have a look at a few keywords we the British voter may be looking for that could show BNP polices that would be good for the country:

Education – 43

Health – 37

Economy – 35

Environment – 28

Pensions – 25

Welfare – 20

Crime – 18

Jobs – 14

Climate 10

So just looking at this rather nerdy keyword count you can see just where the priorities of the British National Party are, they have less concern for the real issues facing the country today, but they can certainly write a lot of junk when it comes to the subjects they love.

Vote No To The BNP in 2010

©2010 Vote-No-To-BNP

As I have been reading through the British National Party (BNP) 2010 General Election Manifesto I have come across a number of little gems that the BNP intend to do to us the people of the United Kingdom. I am of course writing individual articles on certain sections of the BNP 2010 Manifesto but I thought it would be worth pointing out some of the items that the Great British voting public may not either bother to read or the BNP candidates on the doorstep won’t bother to tell them.

So here are some of the prize gems from the manifesto that I believe people should know about before considering a vote for the BNP, these are not jokes that I have made up just for the laughs, these really are contained in the BNP 2010 General Election Manifesto:

1. The BNP will enact legislation which will hold journalists and their media outlets criminally liable for knowingly publishing falsehoods.

So wave bye bye to a free press in the UK

2. The BNP believes that the historical record shows that Islam is by its very nature incompatible with modern secular western democracy.

We’re not racist really, but it’s all them bloody Muslims fault

3. The BNP will ban the burka, ritual slaughter and the building of further mosques in Britain.

Another wave bye bye to freedom of religion and faith in the UK

4. The BNP believes that there should be absolutely no further immigration from any Muslim countries, as it presents one of the most deadly threats yet to the survival of our nation.

We’re not racist, but it’s them Muslims that are causing all the problems in the country today, so we should not let anymore in and kick out all the ones that are here.

5. We propose the immediate deportation of all radical Islamist preachers, those proven to have attended any of their inflammatory sermons, and any other members of their community who object to these reasonable security measures.

So if you’re Muslim and have ever attended a mosque that in any way said anything detrimental about a white British person then bye bye, get out, see ya. How many people reading this can see straight through this as we can use this to get rid of any and all Muslims and no one could stop us?

6. The BNP will withdraw our troops from Germany

Ah so the British Army who use Germany as a staging area and training facility for thousands of troops will have to close it down, and then find enough space in UK facilities to house all the soldiers/families/kids etc. It seems to me that the BNP really have no idea of the importance of the UK having these facilities spread around the world.

Should any campaign call for an urgent response under a BNP Government we would have to say, hold on a minute Mr terrorist don’t start yet we have got to get our soldiers out there first, what bloody foolish logic.

7. The UK requires a capability to mobilise units and dispatch them in defence of British interests worldwide. This will entail the development of new aircraft carriers, new transport aircraft and helicopters.

So instead of having our worldwide staging areas that we already have paid for, set up, equiped and manned we are going to build new Planes and Aircraft Carriers to carry troops to any place in the world they may be needed, I refer you back to my previous “hold on Mr terrorist” comment above.

8. Britain must be prepared to launch limited operations where it is necessary to protect our citizens abroad and not be deterred by ‘world opinion’.

So pretty much anyone we don’t like we will attack without considering what the rest of the world may think, if a Muslim state says or does something we don’t like, we’re sending the boys in and sod the Human Rights, Geneva Convention etc, we are the BNP, we are the all mighty.

9. We shall restore many of the historic regiments, particularly those from Scotland, which were disbanded by the Labour government.

The British Army will once again be the best in the world if only we wound the clock back 50, 60 or even 100 years and started off some of the old regiment names.

10. We will raise spending on defence by one percent over the rate of inflation for the next five years so that our forces may never again be committed to any conflict short of equipment or kit, as has been the case with the shameful deployment in the Tory/Labour war in Afghanistan.

Surely an increase in the Armed forces budget would effectively be wasted money? if under a BNP government we would not be taking part in any operations around the world we don’t need to have such a big armed force, we don’t need as many soldiers as we have now, we don’t need as much equipment for the smaller armed services?

11. At current immigration and birth rates, indigenous British people are set to become a minority well within 50 years. This will result in the extinction of the British people, culture, heritage and identity.

I do love this one, as if you read the BNP 2005 General Election Manifesto it clearly says we will be a minority in our own country within 20 years, so either they got that wrong, just made it up or our Governments have been doing something to change the way immigration works in the UK?

According to the BNP’s own words, since 2005 we have managed to extend becoming a minority in our own country by 30 years so something is working then.

12. The BNP will review all citizenship grants awarded since Labour entered government in 1997, based on that party’s admission that they orchestrated mass immigration to forcibly change Britain’s demographics and to gerrymander elections.

I think I mentioned this one in the article earlier today, but I thought it well worth a second mention as it means the BNP will be able to set whatever rules it deems right to deport anyone they feel like in reality.

13. The BNP will repeal the Race Relations Act and all other far leftist social engineering projects, such as the Equalities and Human Rights Commission aimed at enforcing multiculturalism.

So anyone that isn’t white British who can trace their heritage back to the “ice age” according to the BNP Deputy Leader Simon Darby will basically have no rights under a BNP Government.

14. Britain is already the most densely populated nation in Europe and a BNP government would officially declare it to be a non-immigration country.

Nothing we didn’t already know, the BNP don’t want anyone who isn’t white British or European in the country, but wait for the instant contradiction in the BNP manifesto, the very next line is this:

15. Work permits will only be issued in exceptional circumstances, for example, when the Government determines there is a need to rebuild British industry or when there is a genuine shortage of skills.

So we’ve been declared a non-immigration country, but then we are letting people in? I don’t know about you but whoever wrote this seriously needs to go back to school and see the daftness in these two statements.

Good god the immigration stuff goes on and on for pages and pages, not bad for the we’re not a one trick one policy party who are not all about immigration, ok i’m bored of reading about the bloody immigrants and the BNP telling me it’s all their fault (total bollox) time to skip a few pages and see what else we can find.

Oh ok just one more from the massive list of things the BNP will do to attack the immigrant population of the UK.

16. We shall abolish government-sponsored ethnicity-specific professional bodies, housing associations and other organisations.

So anything that isn’t set up directly for the white British population shall be gone, if it’s designed to promote anything to do with people who don’t look just like me it’s gone. Wow lets role the clock back to the 30, 40, 50′s and go the whole hog and move to full segregation.

Oh damn it, I said just one more that attacks the immigrants population, but I have just read this one and thought I have to include it.

17. We shall legislate to ensure the only languages permitted in local and national governmental documents and papers will be English, Welsh, Cornish, Manx and Gaelic, where applicable. The employment of native languages on the part of ethnic minorities in their own homes, schools and institutions will be encouraged.

So no racism here then? if you don’t speak English, Welsh, Cornish, Manx or Gaelic then off you pop, nothing here for you to read, bye bye cya. The more I read the more it looks like the BNP want to turn the United Kingdom into a repressive state where you either conform or go.

Oh my god, this one is scary, I mentioned segregation not so long ago, and here it comes people

18. A Clause 28-style proscription against the promotion of racial integration in schools and the media will be introduced.

So Clause 28 all over again, but what the obviously says is against the promotion of racial intergration, which even to a not so trained chimp say whites and non-whites will be taught in different schools, in other plain English words Segregation and Apartheid regime working within our school system.

As a country we moved from hatred and slavery so many years ago now, but the BNP seem to want to turn Britain into a mini South Africa, this alone will isolate us from the rest of the right thinking world and European states. Well done BNP way to completely screw the country.

19. The BNP will launch a “polluter pays” policy in the fight against environmental damage.

A “pollutter pays” i.e a new tax, what the BNP haven’t explained is who this applies to, is it for business or individuals? how much will it cost us? etc etc etc, so many questions and yet again no answers in the BNP 2010 Manifesto.

It seems the BNP hardly has one policy that doesn’t in some way involve immigration, I am currently quoting from the so called Environment Policy ideas, but it is full of references to it all being about immigration, here are a few more examples from the Environment Section:

20. Our ‘green and pleasant land’ is rapidly disappearing as Britain has become one of the most densely populated countries in the world.

Mass immigration has fuelled this overpopulation. Official estimates predict that, if left unchecked, immigration into Britain will require a city the size of Birmingham to be built every five years and result in a total population of 90 million people by 2050.

We see here this really is an all out attack on immigrants, and followed by making an assumption of having a population of 90 million by 2050, NO OFFICIAL reports have been produced that project any population stats up to 2050, the ONS have produced a report that has projections for 2030 which say 70 million, so the BNP are assuming that we will add 20 million to the population in 20 years, that’s one million new people each year.

21. Already, immigration accounts for 40 percent of all new households established in Britain.

The BNP obviously provide no data/evidence to prove this, so we can only yet it is either another lie by the BNP. And the BNP think immigration should feature in a so called environment policy.

22. The BNP shall legislate to ensure that pensions and benefits are eligible only to Britons and those who have paid into the system over their lifetime.

So basically if you moved here lets say when you were 25, you will never have any chance of getting a state pension, because you haven’t paid into the system for you ‘lifetime’, lets be under no illusion here the BNP will do anything and everything to push out anyone who isn’t white-British, that is 100% clear from reading its manifesto which gives maybe a page or half a page yet when it comes to any issue that directly relates to immigrants they can run off pages and pages in this manifesto document.

23. The BNP will renationalise the welfare state. Access to education, the NHS, benefits, council houses and pensions will only be available to the British people and those who have paid into the welfare system.

Our welfare system is already nationalised, so what are the BNP talking about here? it seems fairly obvious YET again that this is aimed at immigrants, I have no doubt that what this means in reality is if you were not born here you and your family will have no access to the NHS or Education in Britain.

24. The BNP will repeal the 1998 Human Rights Act

25. Withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights

So under the BNP we the British peoples will have no basic human rights at all, we done BNP way to remove the rights held so dear by the peoples of the world.

26. The BNP will create a pan-British parliament to oversee those policy areas currently determined by Westminster and invite the Irish Republic to join as an equal partner.

Way to set the Ireland question back a few decades there BNP, the Irish Republic is a country within itself, they manage quiet nicely running by themselves. Doing this will clearly just inflame the current Northern Ireland problem which has taken so many years to settle and tuen into a positive and stop the terror attacks of organisations like the IRA etc.

27. The BNP will restrict the use of postal voting only to those incapable of getting to the polling station on election day.

This is easy to explain the BNP are so convinced that postal voting is a conspiracy and fraud by the other parties to ensure they get more votes, a policy like this only goes to prove the BNP are so wrapped up in conspiracy theories and distrust and fear that they even have to consider including this in a manifesto.

28. Protect all political parties and groups from the use of violence or intimidation for political purposes. The violation of this law will carry a minimum two year prison term.

Basically meaning if you want to even consider a demonstration against the BNP and throw one egg etc you will be in prison for 2 years, because the regime don’t want the citizens voicing their opinions.

29. Outlaw third party organisations who do not contest elections from issuing material designed to denigrate individual candidates or parties, thereby allowing political rivals to circumvent the proper spending limits on election expenses.

Another way of stopping organistions that would wish to disagree with a BNP Government, organisations like Hope Not Hate, Nothing British etc, they will be banned by law from existing because they would wish to speak out against the BNP, so much for democracy then BNP, if people want to disagree with you, you will simply ban them and imprison people for standing against you. So much for a democratic Britain we will become a dictatorship state under the BNP which has been made clear from this manifesto.

30. Outlaw the conducting or publication of opinion polls in the last three weeks of an election campaign to prevent manipulation of the democratic process.

Frankly I see no logical sense in this at all, we all love the opinion polls it’s part of our democratic process, the only reason I could suggest for this is the anti-BNP loby love to quote that the BNP are nowhere in the polls, by not allowing polls the voters will have to listen to what the BNP are saying, and we know how much they love to lie.

31. Reintroduce treason legislation to prosecute those who undermine the British constitution.

This one is easy, the BNP continually claim that once in power they will hang people like Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, David Cameron etc, so they will come up with a daft treason law that they can try and convict in a kangaroo court anyone they either don’t like or stands against them, at which point they can convict and hang them, again with the DICTATORSHIP government.

32. Often, the media portrays the white working class in the most negative, unattractive and unacceptable light. This practice must stop.

So we need to show the white British people as the master race on TV and everyone else must be depicted as second class and less important that the white British, I don’t know about you but for a Government to want to dictate to the television shows just how to portray people makes us sound like we need to have a state control of just what we can watch and what it is allowed to show us.

Yet more snapshots of the dictatorship that the BNP would have us living under, we will soon be controlled like China on what we can watch read and told just what we can believe.

Here I must take a break, the article is getting longer, my eyes are full of the tears of laughter and to be honest my beer is calling me. So here I will end part one.

Stay tuned for part two.

Vote No To The BNP in 2010

©2010 Vote-No-To-BNP

The British National Party (BNP) has a very small page on it’s proposed “community award scheme” something I am interested in is encouraging our youth to get involved and learn a work ethic at a young age (thus helping towards keeping down unemployment later in life), but this ‘policy’ from the BNP doesn’t seem to offer anything of any real substance to our kids as they leave school.

Page 15 of the 2010 Manifesto is headed: Community Award Scheme Will Encourage Social Values and Work Ethics

This is how the policy/programme is set out in the BNP 2010 General Election Manifesto:

We will introduce a Community Award Scheme for our young people which will take the form of a compulsory one year period for all school leavers during which they will work in the community as the final element of their education.

This scheme will allow young people to choose between a variety of community service options which might include, for example, caring for the elderly or disabled people, environmental or heritage restoration projects or military training.

The final choice of direction in this regard will be dictated by the school leaver’s scholastic record, preferences and suitability.

These courses would be character building and would instil discipline, social and community values and work ethics in all young people.

Service in this scheme would entitle each individual to receive something back from the society to which they have learnt to contribute, such as free university education, a properly supported apprenticeship or business training.

And that’s it, nothing about costing, who will administer the programme, no idea of how many kids will be entering the programme each year, and no mention of what will happen to the kids that decide not to take part in the programme.

There is no mention of whether kids decide they want to attend six form that they would be exempt from this scheme, so we will have to base the cost on ALL 16 y/olds attending the scheme for one year. So we the tax payers will have find the funding to monitor/manage all our school leavers for a year.

The BNP haven’t shown any costing for this at all in the policy, lets consider how much it would cost to run and manage this scheme each and every year out of Tax Payers money.

Things we would need to pay for:

1. Staff/Supervisors/Managers/Organisers to set up and monitor the scheme, to get all the work placements within charities etc that would be needed to provide this scheme to each and every school leaver.

2. There is no mention as to whether the BNP would be paying the kids for any of the work they are doing, so we’ll have to assume the BNP want to make kids do this one years work for free.

3. Pay all travel/lunch etc costs for the kids to attend (as they won’t be being paid)

4. Training, we can’t just park kids with the elderly without properly training them first

5. Equipment that would be needed for the kids to take part in any particular programme

6. Qualifications we can’t just expect these kids to take part in this scheme without providing them a usable qualification they can take on in their lives.

Now i’m going to offer a conservative estimate of the yearly cost of this scheme to us the tax payers, having a far bit of experience in this area (from my own career background) I would estimate that this one scheme alone would cost on a lower estimate (implying BNP would run it a cheap as possible) £500 to £700 million pounds per year, and remember this will be each and every year.

The BNP say only by school leavers completing this one year programme can they have any rights to access further/higher education. So what happens to all those kids who either leave the programme or don’t even start it? are they just thrown aside and ignored? given no access to any further/education and training?

This policy will not improve the prospects of our youth is will create a throw away society, where are kids are thrown to one side and ignored because they didn’t take part in this scheme.

Other parties are making similar proposals however theirs are all fully costed, offer decent qualifications and experience and are ALL VOLUNTARY.

Now I am certainly all for teaching our kids the value of decent work ethics and taking an active part in society and community, but to force each and every school leaver into such a scheme will NOT empower them at all, it will degrade them and in many cases end up forcing kids to do thngs they really have no interest in.

We should be encouraging kids to seek out their own path, not force a path onto them, we should be helping kids towards a sustainable future, where they can be guided into the right path for them a path that will give them a solid base on which to build a future career for themselves.

By forcing kids to participate in such a scheme we are acting like an army officer shouting instructions at them, you will do this, this is the career we are telling you to take, this the position we have picked for you in society. Do you really want a Government that dictates to your kids and gives them no real option?

Vote No To The BNP in 2010

©2010 Vote-No-To-BNP

And here we have it, the British National Party (BNP) has launched it’s 2010 General Election Manifesto. During the Manifesto launch Nick Griffin MEP and BNP Leader went to great pains to say the party is about more than Immigration.

So I thought the first thing I would do is go through the manifesto and see just how many of the policies/pledges/plans for the country the BNP have that mention immigrants and blames immigrants for what ever they can, so here goes:

I am going to skip over the obvious Immigration Policy (which is no big shock that it comes first) we’ve all heard it before, I will however pick up the one new point that the BNP have added to their Immigration Policy:

• The BNP will review all citizenship grants awarded since Labour entered government in 1997, based on that party’s admission that they orchestrated mass immigration to change forcibly Britain’s demographics and to gerrymander elections.

And we can guess what this means then can’t we, just about every person who has been granted citizenship since 1997 will have that taken away under whatever rules the BNP come up with to work by, so there’s a few million people the BNP will deport/repatriate.

Environmental Protection and the “Climate Change” Theory

Now you would think that the BNP couldn’t seriously find anything in an environment section to blame immigrants for wouldn’t you? …. oops how wrong can you be the very first line goes like this:

• The BNP demands an end to the destruction of Britain’s green belt, caused primarily by housing demand fuelled through mass immigration.

This is a new addition to previous BNP manifestos, and one which I really honestly have no idea why a ‘serious political party’ would want to include in a manifesto:

Counter Jihad: Confronting the Islamic Colonisation of Britain

• The BNP is implacably opposed to the Labour/Tory regime’s mass immigration policies which, if left unchecked, will see Britain and most of Europe colonised by Islam within a few decades.

• The BNP believes that the historical record shows that Islam is by its very nature incompatible with modern secular western democracy.

• The BNP will ban the burka, ritual slaughter and the building of further mosques in Britain.

• The BNP believes that there should be absolutely no further immigration from any Muslim countries, as it presents one of the most deadly threats yet to the survival of our nation.

• We propose the immediate deportation of all radical Islamist preachers, those proven to have attended any of their inflammatory sermons, and any other members of their community who object to these reasonable security measures.

• The BNP is the only party to identify correctly the twin causes of Islamist terrorism in Britain: (a) mass immigration and (b) a biased British foreign policy which serves to incite Muslims living in Britain.

For a party that claims it has more to it than immigration and blaming immigrants and Muslims for everything the manifesto so far is filled with hatred of immigrants and Muslims in particular and i’m only on page 7 of the 90 pages.

Renationalising the Welfare State

• The BNP will halt the handout of benefits, housing, education and pensions to foreigners who have not paid into the system.

Transport: Getting Britain Moving Again

• The BNP will reduce traffic congestion by bringing the immigration invasion under control.

So here the BNP are blaming immigrants for traffic congestion, how ridiculous can any so called political party really be?

Housing: Sheltering the Nation

• The BNP will relieve part of the housing crisis by halting and reversing the immigration invasion.

Having just worked through the first set of one liners in the BNP Manifesto we can see the BNP still blame the immigrants for just about everything they can. Now moving on to the I hope more detailed parts of the manifesto so far it’s all just one liners.

I will write more on the manifesto shortly after spending some time wiping the tears of laughter from my eyes and working through the ‘actual’ policy,  but I thought it would be interesting to highlight the BNP claims of being more than about immigration, all the above were in just the first 10 pages of the 2010 General Election Manifesto. No doubt as I read through there will be far more.

Vote No To The BNP in 2010

©2010 Vote-No-To-BNP